Is public option a threat to private insurance?

mikehudack:

squashed:

jeffmiller writes:

How could a public option drive private options out of business?  Simple:  The Government has the ability to tax citizens to obtain money to subsidize a public option.  Private business do not have a similar coercive way to raise money.  This provides the Government with a significant competitive advantage.  Sadly, this advantage has nothing to do with the quality of care.

Why can’t we set up the public option to force it to be competitive? It’s easy. Put the money in a separate pile.

  1. Give the public option sufficient money to get set up and to start enrolling people.
  2. After a few years, cut off its supply of money.
  3. Require that any subsidies for those who cannot afford insurance are also made available for private plans.

We can make sure there’s a level playing field between government and private industry. Of course, the insurance industry doesn’t want the competition.



artistspaid:

allisonweiss:

Alright. This is amazing. Could Amanda Palmer be any more of a badass? No.

But I must say that I believe her Twitter success goes beyond simply using the service. It’s because (a) She is Amanda Palmer (b) she treats her fans like friends (c) Her goal with Twitter is not to make money.

I’m afraid people will read this article and think they should jump on the Twitter bandwagon so they can score some cash. That’s not what its about. It’s about connecting with people. You might make money, but first you have earn the support of your followers.

That said, I don’t think you have to be famous. You just have to be real. I made $2000 in 10 hours, $4000 in 24… and I am so very far from famous.

It’s all about believing in eachother! I’m now having a blast making this album thanks to the help I got on Twitter and Tumblr. You guys are the best.



"Is the system going to flatten you out and deny you your humanity, or are you going to be able to make use of the system to the attainment of human purposes?"
— Joseph Campbell (via welcomeghostsproject)


"If every U.S. citizen ate just one meal a week made of locally and organically raised meats and produce, we would reduce our country’s oil consumption by over 1.1 million barrels of oil every week. That’s not gallons, but barrels. Small changes in buying habits can make big differences. Becoming a less energy-dependent nation may just need to start with a good breakfast."
— Steven L. Hopp (via takeoffsandlandings)


"For me, experimentation is not about the technology. In an ever-changing technological landscape, where today’s platforms are not tomorrow’s platforms, the key seems to be that any one of these spaces can use a dose of humanity and art and culture."
Ze Frank. He seems to be hinting at this: maybe your efforts are better spent trying to make something within existing technology, instead of chasing after the next big thing. (via dailymeh)


"When a ringtone plays to signal an incoming call, it is obviously a performance."
ASCAP, showing that they can be just as ridiculous as the RIAA (via ericmortensen) (via johnfitzpatrick) (via mikehudack) (via artistspaid)


staff:

New iPhone Dashboard interface! Much more functional and much prettier.
If you haven’t yet, you can download Tumblr for the iPhone for free. Enjoy!

staff:

New iPhone Dashboard interface! Much more functional and much prettier.

If you haven’t yet, you can download Tumblr for the iPhone for free. Enjoy!



Marshall McLuhan on YouTube (via kenrg)


Chuck Close--

cwphoto:

amyjowisehart:

The advice I like to give young artists, or really anybody who’ll listen to me, is not to wait around for inspiration. Inspiration is for amateurs; the rest of us just show up and get to work. If you wait aroud for the clouds to part and a bolt of lightning to strike you in the brain, you are not going to make an awful lot of work.

I actually disagree fully and think this sentiment sounds like it was spoken with the tongue of a 40-something ex-artist who never actualized his dreams.  Forcing inspiration, at least for me, just doesn’t work.  It has to be fluid for me to even attempt anything.  When I’m not inspired, the shit I create ends up being just that and nothing more. Vast piles of shit.  And the photo work I have to do to make money usually turns out shitty too, because that kind of thing does not inspire me creatively at all.  I know that isn’t the greatest testimony or anything, but art has to be on the person’s own terms creating it.  Forcing such is, in essence, lying.

Quality over quantity.  Always.

Interesting conversation piece, maybe?

Whoever is responding to Chuck Close is clearly an amateur. You have to make plenty of “bad” work while practicing if you expect to make anything great. If you wait for inspiration you are a prisoner to external forces. A huge part of the job of being a creative artist is showing up…every day…and all the time.

Chuck’s work is brilliant. Look it up if you don’t know it…and look up his biography.



THE ART OF THE QUESTION (q. 179-194 of 232)

notesandlinks:

-When do we consider a work/an idea complete?

-How do we value/evaluate a work/an idea? What is aesthetic value?

-Why should we ask questions?

-Why is it important to constantly search for who, why, what, where I am, and what it means to be human? How does art help in this process?

-What is meant by inclusive, accessible, and approachable artwork? How can an artwork accommodate all these qualities, i.e., in its process of making, visual composition, conceptual structure, etc.?

-What is meaning? Does everything have meaning? How do we access it?

-How does the process of naming/defining influence our view of the particular thing that is being named? How does this process contribute to reality as a whole?

-Can we simultaneously be aware of the overall unity, and the arbitrary separation that is caused by the process of naming/defining?

-Is reality unified, or collection of separate entities?

-Where do we choose to draw the line between two items, in order to separate/name them? In a rainbow where does yellow become red?

-Why do we have this process of naming anyway?

-Do we have names in order to be able to identify?

-What is the relationship between an identity and a name? That is, is an artwork’s identity summarized in the name? Is it “political art” political, and “aesthetic art” not political? Where do we draw the line between the two?

-What is “political art”? Does it include the landscape painting on the wall?

-How do we determine that a work of art is political, social, ethnic, classical, contemporary, modern, folk, craft, outsider, visionary, etc.?

-What is expressing oneself? When do we say that a rosebush is expressing itself? When it grows leaves, develops roots, produces branches, buds and flowers, and/or when the flower fades and the leaves turn yellow?

(via burntbythesun)



  21 of 643 
Based on a theme by Hunson (Designed by Josh) / Powered by Tumblr